1) Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups?
2) Was allocation to treatment groups concealed?
3) Were treatment groups similar at baseline?
4) Were participants blind to treatment assignment?
5) Were those delivering the treatment blind to treatment assignment?
6) Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest?
7) Were outcome assessors blind to treatment assignment?
8) Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups?
9) Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?
10) Was follow-up complete, and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analyzed?
11) Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?
12) Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
13) Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomization, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial?
Reference: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools